--- name: analyze description: Deep analysis and investigation --- Analyze performs deep investigation of architecture, bugs, performance issues, and dependencies. It routes to the architect Claude agent for thorough analysis and returns structured findings with evidence. - User says "analyze", "investigate", "debug", "why does", or "what's causing" - User needs to understand a system's architecture or behavior before making changes - User wants root cause analysis of a bug or performance issue - User needs dependency analysis or impact assessment for a proposed change - A complex question requires reading multiple files and reasoning across them - User wants code changes made -- use executor agents or `ralph` instead - User wants a full plan with acceptance criteria -- use `plan` skill instead - User wants a quick file lookup or symbol search -- use `explore` agent instead - User asks a simple factual question that can be answered from one file -- just read and answer directly Deep investigation requires a different approach than quick lookups or code changes. Analysis tasks need broad context gathering, cross-file reasoning, and structured findings. Routing these to the architect agent or Codex ensures the right level of depth without the overhead of a full planning or execution workflow. - Route analysis to the architect Claude agent for thorough investigation - Always gather context files before spawning the architect agent for grounded reasoning - Return structured findings, not just raw observations 1. **Identify the analysis type**: Architecture, bug investigation, performance, or dependency analysis 2. **Gather relevant context**: Read or identify the key files involved 3. **Route to analyzer**: `Task(subagent_type="oh-my-claudecode:architect", model="opus", prompt="Analyze: ...")` 4. **Return structured findings**: Present the analysis with evidence, file references, and actionable recommendations - Use `Task(subagent_type="oh-my-claudecode:architect", model="opus", ...)` as the primary analysis route - For broad analysis, use `explore` agent first to identify relevant files before routing to architect User: "analyze why the WebSocket connections drop after 30 seconds" Action: Gather WebSocket-related files, route to architect with context, return root cause analysis with specific file:line references and a recommended fix. Why good: Clear investigation target, structured output with evidence. User: "investigate the dependency chain from src/api/routes.ts" Action: Use explore agent to map the import graph, then route to architect for impact analysis. Why good: Uses explore for fact-gathering, architect for reasoning. User: "analyze the auth module" Action: Returning "The auth module handles authentication." Why bad: Shallow summary without investigation. Should examine the module's structure, patterns, potential issues, and provide specific findings with file references. User: "fix the bug in the parser" Action: Running analysis skill. Why bad: This is a fix request, not an analysis request. Route to executor or ralph instead. - If analysis reveals the issue requires code changes, report findings and recommend using `ralph` or executor for the fix - If the analysis scope is too broad ("analyze everything"), ask the user to narrow the focus - If Codex is unavailable and the architect agent also fails, report what context was gathered and suggest manual investigation paths - [ ] Analysis addresses the specific question or investigation target - [ ] Findings reference specific files and line numbers where applicable - [ ] Root causes are identified (not just symptoms) for bug investigations - [ ] Actionable recommendations are provided - [ ] Analysis distinguishes between confirmed facts and hypotheses Task: {{ARGUMENTS}}

analyze

Scan your own AI components