--- name: readme-md description: Guides README creation and improvement with audience-matched templates. Use when writing READMEs for open source, personal, internal, or config projects, or when the user mentions documentation, README, or project setup. license: MIT context: fork agent: general-purpose argument-hint: "[task] [project-type]" --- # Crafting Effective READMEs ## Overview Identify the audience first. Match sections, depth, and tone to what that audience needs. ## User Input **User request:** $ARGUMENTS If `$ARGUMENTS` is non-empty, extract the task type (creating, adding, updating, reviewing) and project type (OSS, personal, internal, config) from it. Skip Step 1 and proceed to Step 2. Only ask clarifying questions if the task or project type is entirely unclear. If `$ARGUMENTS` is empty, begin at Step 1. ## Quick Workflow Copy this checklist: ``` README Progress: - [ ] Task identified: Creating / Adding / Updating / Reviewing - [ ] Audience identified: _____ - [ ] Project type: OSS / Personal / Internal / Config - [ ] Template selected from templates/ - [ ] Draft complete - [ ] Verified: draft matches actual project state (package.json, directory structure, commands) - [ ] Asked: "Anything else to highlight or include that I might have missed?" ``` ## Process ### Step 1: Identify the Task **Ask:** "What README task are you working on?" | Task | When | |------|------| | **Creating** | New project, no README yet | | **Adding** | Need to document something new | | **Updating** | Capabilities changed, content is stale | | **Reviewing** | Checking if README is still accurate | ### Step 2: Task-Specific Questions **Creating initial README:** 1. What type of project? (see Project Types below) 2. What problem does this solve in one sentence? 3. What's the quickest path to "it works"? 4. Anything notable to highlight? **Adding a section:** 1. What needs documenting? 2. Where should it go in the existing structure? 3. Who needs this info most? **Updating existing content:** 1. What changed? 2. Read current README, identify stale sections 3. Propose specific edits **Reviewing/refreshing:** 1. Read current README 2. Check against actual project state (package.json, main files, etc.) 3. Flag outdated sections 4. Update "Last reviewed" date if present ### Step 3: Always Ask After drafting, ask: **"Anything else to highlight or include that I might have missed?"** ## Project Types | Type | Audience | Key Sections | Template | |------|----------|--------------|----------| | **Open Source** | Contributors, users worldwide | Install, Usage, Contributing, License | `assets/templates/oss.md` | | **Personal** | Future you, portfolio viewers | What it does, Tech stack, Learnings | `assets/templates/personal.md` | | **Internal** | Teammates, new hires | Setup, Architecture, Runbooks | `assets/templates/internal.md` | | **Config** | Future you (confused) | What's here, Why, How to extend, Gotchas | `assets/templates/xdg-config.md` | **Ask the user** if unclear. Don't assume OSS defaults for everything. ## Essential Sections (All Types) Every README needs at minimum: 1. **Name** - Self-explanatory title 2. **Description** - What + why in 1-2 sentences 3. **Usage** - How to use it (examples help) ## Examples **Task:** Creating README for OSS CLI tool **Before (typical first draft):** ```markdown # mytool A tool for doing stuff with files. ## Installation npm install mytool ## Usage mytool [options] ``` **After (audience-focused):** ```markdown # mytool Convert CSV files to JSON with one command. Handles messy data, encoding issues, and files up to 2GB. ## Quick Start ```bash npm install -g mytool mytool input.csv > output.json ``` ## Common Use Cases ```bash # Skip header row mytool --skip-header data.csv # Handle non-UTF8 encoding mytool --encoding latin1 legacy.csv ``` ``` **Why better:** Shows the problem it solves, demonstrates real scenarios, gives copy-paste commands. **Task:** Updating README after adding new feature **Before (buried in wall of text):** ```markdown ## Features This tool does X, Y, Z. It also now supports authentication via OAuth which can be configured using environment variables or a config file. ``` **After (scannable, actionable):** ```markdown ## Features - **X** - Does this - **Y** - Does that - **Z** - Does the other thing - **OAuth auth** (new in v2.0) - See [Authentication](#authentication) ## Authentication Set `MYTOOL_OAUTH_TOKEN` or add to `~/.mytoolrc`: ```yaml auth: provider: oauth token: your-token ``` ``` **Why better:** New feature is discoverable, has its own section, shows exactly how to use it. **Task:** Config folder README (for future-you) **Before (no README or unhelpful):** ```markdown # Config My config files. ``` **After (answers future-you's questions):** ```markdown # Neovim Config ## What's Here - `init.lua` - Entry point, loads everything else - `lua/plugins/` - Plugin configs (lazy.nvim) - `lua/keymaps.lua` - All custom keybindings ## Key Choices - **Why lazy.nvim?** Fastest loader, good defaults - **Why no LSP here?** Using Mason, see `lua/plugins/lsp.lua` ## Gotchas - Run `:Lazy sync` after pulling changes - `` is space (set in init.lua line 12) ``` **Why better:** Future-you at 2am will thank past-you for the "Gotchas" section. **Task:** Creating README for internal team service **Before (missing operational context):** ```markdown # User Service Handles users. ## Setup Run `docker compose up`. ``` **After (onboarding-ready):** ```markdown # User Service Manages authentication, profiles, and role-based access for the platform. **Team**: #platform-eng | **On-call**: PagerDuty rotation ## Dependencies - **Upstream**: PostgreSQL, Redis, Auth0 - **Downstream**: Billing Service, Notification Service ## Local Setup ### Prerequisites - Docker Desktop >= 4.x - Access to 1Password `Platform Eng` vault for env vars ### Run ```bash cp .env.example .env # then fill from 1Password docker compose up -d curl http://localhost:3000/health # expect {"status":"ok"} ``` ### Tests ```bash npm test # unit tests npm run test:integration # requires running Docker services ``` ## Troubleshooting ### Auth0 callback fails locally **Fix**: Set `AUTH0_BASE_URL=http://localhost:3000` in `.env`. The default points to staging. ``` **Why better:** New team members can run the service in under 5 minutes. Troubleshooting section prevents the most common support question. **Task:** Reviewing an existing README for accuracy **Before (stale, misleading):** ```markdown # datakit A Python library for CSV processing. ## Installation pip install datakit ## Usage ```python from datakit import process process("input.csv") ``` ``` **Review findings:** 1. Project now supports JSON and Parquet (added 6 months ago), not just CSV 2. `process()` was renamed to `transform()` in v2.0 3. Requires Python 3.10+, not mentioned anywhere 4. No mention of the new CLI interface added in v1.8 **After (accurate, current):** ```markdown # datakit Transform CSV, JSON, and Parquet files with a single API or CLI command. ## Installation Requires Python 3.10+ ```bash pip install datakit ``` ## Usage ### Python API ```python from datakit import transform transform("input.csv", output_format="json") ``` ### CLI ```bash datakit convert input.csv --to json datakit convert data.parquet --to csv ``` ``` **Why better:** Every section matches the actual project state. Stale docs erode trust faster than no docs. ## References | File | Purpose | |------|---------| | `references/section-checklist.md` | Which sections to include by project type | | `references/style-guide.md` | Common README mistakes and prose guidance | | `references/art-of-readme.md` | Philosophy: cognitive funneling, brevity, key elements | | `references/make-a-readme.md` | Section-by-section guidance for what to include | | `references/standard-readme-spec.md` | Formal spec for standardised README format | | `references/standard-readme-example-minimal.md` | Minimal compliant README example | | `references/standard-readme-example-maximal.md` | Full-featured README example | | `assets/templates/` | Ready-to-use templates: oss, personal, internal, xdg-config |

readme-md

Scan your own AI components